Skip to content
Non Stop Growth

Research Review | 2026

Measuring Community Violence Intervention Outcomes

What can honestly be measured in community violence intervention, and how to read violence numbers carefully.

M. McDaniel, M. McDaniel

Abstract

Counting contacts, mediations and sessions describes effort rather than outcome. This review distinguishes activity from outcome measurement, sets out what independent evaluation adds, and offers cautions for reading violence data in small areas and short periods.

Context

Activity is not outcome

Counting contacts, mediations and sessions describes effort. It does not by itself demonstrate that violence changed.

Useful measurement pairs documented activity with outcome data for a defined area and period, and is honest about what the data can and cannot attribute.

Evidence / Literature

What independent evaluation adds

An outside evaluator applies methods the organization does not control and reports findings the organization cannot edit. That separation is what makes a finding usable by funders, city partners and researchers.

The Akron Street Team's independent evaluation is summarized in text and published in full on this site.

Limitations / Areas for Further Study

Reading violence numbers carefully

Violence data is volatile in small areas and short periods. Year-to-year movement can reflect many causes at once, and no single program should claim a whole city's trend.

  • State the area and time period being described
  • Separate program outcomes from citywide trends
  • Report methodology and source alongside the number
  • Keep public claims within what the evidence supports